What's New
AMWelcome to the new AMWA-MAC Newsletter!
Download
Registration is now open for the 2012 Chapter Conference!
Download brochure
AMWA-MAC Financial 2011 Report now available
Coming Up
2012 AMWA-MAC Chapter Conference, Friday, March 23, 2012
more...
Recent Events
Report on Chapter Greet-and-Go at AMWA annual conference
more...
Report on NoVA September 21st Get-together
more...
Report on September 20th Central VA Get-together
more...
Report on Bethesda|DC|Silver Spring September 15th Networking Event
more...
2011 Annual Mid-Atlantic Chapter Conference report
more...
Workshop Review: Essential Ethics for Medical Communicators more...
Report on webcast: “PubMed vs. Medline Plus vs. Google”
more... Audio
Report on Frederick Networking Luncheon
more...
Special Topics
Chapter Members Have Been Earning Core Certificates
more...
Contribute to the AMWA Journal
more...
New Member Profiles...
more...
From Our President
more...
The Allen Spinal Cord Atlas Unveiled...
more...
What to Charge: Pricing Strategies for Freelancers and Consultants
more...
2011 Annual Mid-Atlantic Chapter Conference — Report
Workshop Review: Essential Ethics for Medical Communicators (Essential Skills)
Instructor: Charmaine J. Cummings, PhD, RN
Reporter: Michael S. Altus, PhD, ELS
I had been skeptical about the value of a workshop about ethics for medical communicators. Having written “AMWA Ethics FAQs”, I somewhat smugly assumed that there wasn’t much else to essential ethics for medical communicators besides ghostwriting, and there wasn’t much about ghostwriting that I hadn’t heard about. I was in for a humbling and highly worthwhile experience.
The workshop started with definitions of words such as “ethics,” “law,” and “morality.” Then Dr. Cummings, a continuing medical education professional, referred to AMWA’s Code of Ethics and to other codes of ethics.
But, as Dr. Cummings explained, codes of ethics are only guides. What to do?
The key strengths in the workshop, and what meant the most to me, were in finding about an answer to the question, “How should ethical situations be handled?”, and then in dividing up into groups to discuss handling case studies in ethics.
To answer the question about how to handle ethical situations, Dr. Cummings presented a highly useful process, “The RIGHT Decision”, which was developed by a group of AMWA members:
- Recognize: What is the situation and why is it important?
- Investigate: Why is the situation occurring, what are the facts, and how do ethics codes inform handling the situation?
- Gauge: What are possible courses of action?
- Handle: Should action be taken immediately or stepwise, and who else might be needed to implement the action?
- Tailor: What are the lessons to be learned, and how might I need to change my own behavior?
Participants then divided up into groups of three or four to consider a case study in ethics to apply the RIGHT Decision. For example, in one of these case studies, a writer working for a contract research organization (an organization that provides research support services to client pharmaceutical and device companies) prepared a report showing statistically significant side effects in a study of a client’s new drug. Concerned that the pharmaceutical company client would take its business elsewhere, the writer’s supervisor asked the writer to “spin” the conclusions. What are ethical paths for the writer?
After about one-half hour during which the groups considered their cases, participants regrouped as a whole, and each group reported on its findings. I was greatly impressed by how much can be accomplished by having ethical situations be discussed in groups. However, in another case study, Dr. Cummings wrote that the situation “raises the big question of what to do in a situation where the powers that be do not have the same ethical standards as the writer.” I had the impression that participants were overly optimistic about outcomes in situations in which “the powers that be” would mend their ways and follow an ethical path.
The workshop had shortcomings. In preparing a case study for the precourse homework assignment, and in considering the case studies discussed during the workshop, I thought that I had to force myself to find an applicable principle in AMWA’s Code of Ethics. The introductory material provided during the workshop about AMWA’s history and educational program was unnecessary, and the discussion of AMWA’s Code of Ethics could have been shortened. The workshop fell behind schedule. But even so, the pacing did not feel rushed. The workshop’s shortcomings were amply compensated for by its “longcomings.” Dr. Cummings is a master teacher.
Ethical situations are uncomfortable to discuss and in other respects are difficult to handle. Meanwhile, medical communicators have justifiably been subject to criticism for their complicity in unethical practices such as ghostwriting. For the sake of our profession and for ourselves, we need hands-on ways to learn about and apply ethical principles. One way is to participate in workshops like Essential Ethics for Medical Communicators. I strongly urge every AMWA member to participate in this workshop to experience the process of learning how to handle ethical situations and to work with others in doing so.
Michael S. Altus, PhD, ELS, a Baltimore-based freelance medical writer and editor, is president of Intensive Care Communications, Inc. He wrote “AMWA Ethics FAQs” for AMWA.
Content on this site is contributed by members of the AMWA Mid-Atlantic Chapter. Opinions stated here do not reflect the views of AMWA Mid-Atlantic Chapter or of AMWA itself. Authors retain copyright to all original material.



